Visual quality objectives key to tourism industry



I am responding to a recent article titled “Forestry officials request help” dated 25 Jan 2011 in the Fort St. James Caledonia Courier.  I was most shocked to read that one individual (Murray) had gone so far as to say “The visual quality objectives do not make much sense and visual quality objectives certainly don’t make any sense at all when you have dead stands.”  There has been a recent spate of attacks by the lumber industry against tourism by attacking the validity of Visual Quality Objectives (I will call them Visuals).  The reporting of the issue appears to be primarily focused on the lumber side of the issue, so I thought it would be beneficial to your readers to hear the tourism point of view.  There are many points of attacks made by the lumber industry, but I would like to focus on the two primary ones: Economics and Fire Hazard.  Using economics or fire hazard to remove Visuals just doesn’t make sense.

Visuals are broken down into 5 levels; Preservation, Retention, Partial Retention, Modification, and Maximum Modification.  Harvesting is allowed in Visuals at every level.  If it isn’t visible, it can be logged.  If it is visible, each Visual level has a percentage of the viewscape that can be altered by logging.

Economically, Visuals are the resource backbone of the tourism industry.  We aren’t called Supernatural BC because of our cutblocks! Removing Visuals would be a devastating blow to tourism that would take decades, even generations to recover.  Visuals are key to attracting tourists.  When doing an economic assessment, actual dollar figures tourism receives as a result of Visuals are hard to quantify.  However, it is important to realize that within each level of Visuals, there is an associated group of tourists who find visible levels of logging acceptable.  Once the Visual drops below the tourist’s acceptable level, the tourist no longer visits the area and the tourism revenue is lost.  In other words,  if you do not have Preservation Visual levels, you will not have tourists who seek an experience at the Preservation level.  If you do not have Retention Visual levels, you will not have tourists who seek an experience at the Retention level.  And so forth.  Ultimately, if you eliminate all visuals, you eliminate all tourists who plan their vacations based on the viewscapes available to them.  This is the entire purpose behind Visuals, to balance the needs of Tourism with the needs of Forestry.  The pine beetle hasn’t changed that.  Logging cutblocks are not better than grey trees to the tourist.  On the contrary, tourists see the pine beetle killed trees as part of a natural process which they accept quite readily.  In many cases the secondary understory growth is already rapidly swallowing up the grey trees.  Now with the dire predictions in the forest industry, what we really need to be doing for our local economy is not removing Visuals, but strengthening our tourism economy by increasing Visuals.  That’s what we need to diversify our economy.  

The forest industry is facing difficult times, we all acknowledge that, but removing Visuals to accommodate logging is extremely shortsighted.  The value of those trees to lumber companies is marginal at best.    At the recent meeting at the Ministry of Forest regarding Visuals, the licensees stated that reducing Visuals will provide only one third of one year towards the Annual Allowable Cut.  Only four months of timber supply, but tourism will be irreparably damaged for 30 years!  How is this logical?  Tourism is far more important to our economies than the salvage value of four months worth of dead pine trees to a mill.  They aren’t even close to logging the Annual Allowable Cut(AAC) now, and until they have harvested the dead pine trees outside Visual areas, why start logging in Visuals?  The answer is simple, they want bigger and better trees for bigger and better profit margins.  This isn’t about timber supply, it’s about profit margins.   It takes decades for a forest to recover sufficiently from logging to return a viewscape to its natural beauty.  Again, look at the economic benefits to the licensees, and the damage to tourism.  Licensees marginally improve production for four months because they claim the wood is better than wood found elsewhere.  They don’t gain or lose jobs since they have plenty of wood available in the AAC, whereas tourism businesses will now lose revenue for 30 years because they lost clients who found the viewscape offensive and planned their vacation elsewhere.  Sacrificing the long term viability of tourism for short term forestry gains is neither reasonable nor desirable for the long term benefits to our economy.

Forest fires are on the minds of all of us in the north these days, especially for those of us who, like myself, were evacuated because of the Binta Lake Fire.  Now forest licensees claim that they need to log Visuals to reduce fire hazard and fuel loading.  Visuals have nothing whatsoever to do with fire.  There already exists logging inside visuals, you just can’t see it as easily.  Visuals are not more or less susceptible to fire, there is no increase or decrease of fire hazard.  It is total nonsense to suggest that forest fires are a result of Visuals, or that harvesting in Visuals will reduce fire hazard.  The Binta Lake fire swept right over logged and Visual areas without prejudice.  

It should be taken into consideration that logging is quantitative.  In other words, if you log in Visuals you aren’t logging somewhere else.  I would suggest you should have the same fire hazard and fuel loading concerns in those areas forest companies will not be logging while they are focused on logging Visuals.  In other words, if fire hazard is the reason, then what about those areas you aren’t logging while you log inside a Visually sensitive area?  Even if I believed Visuals presented a greater risk for fire, which I don’t, forest licensees would just be shifting the problem around from Visual areas to non-Visual ones.  They will never solve fire hazard or fuel loading by harvesting Visuals.  Do they have a specific fire protection plan that provides evidence that they need harvesting in Visuals?  No they do not. If they aren’t going to plan for fire protection, it is ridiculous to use fire protection as rationale for logging.  This claim of fire protection is just a vague generalization without any reality on the ground.  Using fire as rationale is simply fear mongering and suggesting that not harvesting Visuals increases fire hazard just isn’t true.

I hope your readers can make sense of why Visuals are so important to Tourism economically.  Visuals do make sense, they make a lot of sense for tourism, they make a lot of sense for our economy, they make a lot of sense for our communities.

Daniel Brooks

Chair – Upper Nechako Wilderness Council

Just Posted

People had a chance to interact with different animals at the petting zoo, participate in mutton busting, and buy everything local during the Fall Fair held in 2019. (Aman Parhar/Omineca Express)
55th Fall Fair in Vanderhoof cancelled

Alternative events eyed once again

Grads at Riverside Park in Vanderhoof, B.C. (Aman Parhar/Omineca Express)
Vanderhoof celebrates 2021 graduates

NVSS grads got together at Riverside Park on Friday, June 11 in… Continue reading

Singing and drumming was heard in downtown Vanderhoof on Monday, June 14. (Aman Parhar/Omineca Express)
Photos: Honour Walk held in Vanderhoof

An honour walk was held Monday June 14 in Vanderhoof, remembering the… Continue reading

Maxwell Johnson is seen in Bella Bella, B.C., in an undated photo. The Indigenous man from British Columbia has filed complaints with the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal and the Canadian Human Rights Commission after he and his granddaughter were handcuffed when they tried to open a bank account. THE CANADIAN PRESS/HO-Heiltsuk Nation, Damien Gillis, *MANDATORY CREDIT*
VIDEO: Chiefs join human rights case of Indigenous man handcuffed by police in B.C. bank

Maxwell Johnson said he wants change, not just words, from Vancouver police

Tk’emlups te Secwepemc Chief Rosanne Casimir stands outside the former Kamloops Indian Residential School after speaking to reporters, in Kamloops, B.C., on Friday, June 4, 2021.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck
Kamloops chief says more unmarked graves will be found across Canada

Chief Rosanne Casimir told a virtual news conference the nation expects to release a report at the end of June

A woman wears a vaccinated sticker after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine at a vaccination clinic run by Vancouver Coastal Health, in Richmond, B.C., Saturday, April 10, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward
B.C. ranks among highest in world in COVID-19 first-dose shots: health officials

More than 76% of eligible people have received their 1st shot

A screenshot of the First Peoples Cultural Councils First Peoples’ Map. (First Peoples Cultural Council)
Online resource blends B.C.-Alberta’s Indigenous languages, art and culture

Advisor says initiative supports the urgent need to preserve Indigenous languages

An artists conception of the new terminal building at the Pitt Meadows Regional Airport.
Air travel taking off in B.C., but lack of traffic controllers a sky-high concern

There will be demand for more air traffic controllers: Miller

Canadian Armed Forces experts are on their way to North Vancouver after a local homeowner expressed worry about a military artifact he recently purchased. (Twitter DNV Fire and Rescue)
Military called in to deal with antique ‘shell’ at North Vancouver home

‘The person somehow purchased a bombshell innocently believing it was an out-of-commission military artifact’

Amy Kobelt and Tony Cruz have set their wedding date for February, hoping that more COVID-19 restrictions will have lifted. (The Macleans)
B.C. couples ‘gambling’ on whether COVID rules will let them dance at their wedding

Amy Kobelt and Tony Cruz pushed back their wedding in hopes of being able to celebrate it without the constraints of COVID-19

A plane is silhouetted as it takes off from Vancouver International Airport in Richmond, B.C., May 13, 2019. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward
Report calls for airlines to refund passengers for flights halted due to COVID-19

Conclusion: federal help should be on the condition airlines immediately refund Canadian travellers

Most Read